Trump fires key officials in immigration court system overhaul

Four top officials dismissed as part of Donald Trump administration’s aggressive immigration reform strategy.

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during his inauguration at the U.S. Capitol Rotunda on January 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Photo by Julia Demaree Nikhinson/Getty Images

By Clarisa Sendy and Alana Salsabila

In a significant shake-up of the U.S. immigration court system, President Donald Trump dismissed the acting head and three other top officials on Monday, marking the beginning of a broader effort to reshape the nation’s immigration infrastructure. This purge, occurring just hours after Trump’s second term began, signals the administration’s intentions to implement a more aggressive immigration policy, continuing the momentum from his first term’s crackdown.

The acting director of the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), Mary Cheng, along with Chief Immigration Judge Sheila McNulty, Head of Policy Lauren Alder Reid, and General Counsel Jill Anderson, were all fired as part of the administration’s move to reassert control over the immigration court system, which operates under the Justice Department. These officials played critical roles in overseeing asylum decisions and deportation orders, central components of the nation’s immigration enforcement process.

The abrupt dismissals signal that President Trump intends to replace key officials with individuals loyal to his policies, echoing the administration’s approach during his first term. Tom Jawetz, a senior lawyer in the Biden administration's Homeland Security Department, commented that this move suggests a continued effort to sideline veteran career officials in favor of political appointees who align with the president’s immigration agenda. Jawetz noted that such a “Day 1 bloodbath” represents an ongoing disregard for established norms in favor of a more politically driven approach.

The immigration court system is responsible for adjudicating asylum cases and determining whether migrants should be deported. This system has faced immense pressure in recent years due to the growing backlog of cases, which surpassed three million by the end of the 2024 fiscal year. Critics argue that Trump’s overhaul could further exacerbate the situation, as the courts already struggle with limited resources and a significant caseload.

During his first term, Trump’s administration sought to overhaul the immigration court system by implementing strict performance quotas for immigration judges. Additionally, the administration limited the ability of judges to pause cases they deemed non-priority, a move that some argued forced the system to prioritize speed over justice. These changes were part of a larger push to address the growing number of asylum seekers and expedite the deportation process.

Asylum grants became more difficult to secure under the previous administration, with many judges instructed to scrutinize claims more heavily. Trump’s new approach to the immigration court system appears to be an extension of these policies, aimed at reinforcing the president’s “America First” immigration platform.

The dismissals of key immigration court officials are expected to have significant ramifications for the functioning of the immigration courts, which are already facing significant challenges. Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, called the firings a “severe setback” for the immigration court system. He emphasized that experienced administrators are crucial to ensuring that cases are handled efficiently, and the mass firing of senior officials could hinder efforts to reduce the growing backlog of cases.

The firing of these officials further signals a more confrontational approach to immigration policy under Trump’s second term, with an emphasis on limiting the influence of career civil servants in favor of a more politically aligned system. These moves have sparked concerns among immigration advocates who worry that such actions could undermine the fairness and impartiality of the immigration courts.

The immigration court system has been under immense pressure for years, with the backlog of cases growing steadily. As of the end of the 2024 fiscal year, the number of pending immigration cases had reached over three million, a staggering increase from previous years. The backlog has put a strain on immigration judges, who are tasked with making often complex decisions about asylum and deportation cases.

The dismissal of experienced officials at a time when the system is already overwhelmed raises concerns about the ability of the courts to handle the increasing caseload. With fewer seasoned leaders in place, critics argue that the immigration courts may face even greater delays and disruptions, further prolonging the resolution of immigration cases for thousands of individuals.

The firings come as part of a broader effort by President Trump to reshape U.S. immigration policy and enforce a stricter approach to border control and asylum adjudication. The president’s administration has consistently sought to implement policies that reduce the number of migrants allowed to seek asylum and make it more difficult for individuals to secure permanent residency in the United States.

In addition to the overhaul of the immigration courts, the Trump administration has continued to focus on expanding border security and limiting immigration, with measures such as the construction of a border wall and the restriction of legal immigration channels. The latest firings are likely to further strengthen the president’s ability to carry out these policies, with new officials who share his vision of a more restrictive immigration system.

As President Donald Trump moves forward with his aggressive immigration agenda, the fate of the nation’s immigration court system remains uncertain. The dismissals of key officials underscore the administration’s commitment to reshaping the system in ways that align with its broader immigration goals. However, the long-term impact of these changes remains to be seen, as critics warn that such actions could undermine the fairness and efficiency of the courts at a time when they are already overwhelmed by a massive backlog of cases.

The future of the immigration court system is at a crossroads, with the Trump administration pushing for swift and decisive reforms while immigration advocates express concerns about the potential consequences of these changes. As the battle over immigration policy intensifies, the fate of those seeking asylum in the United States may hang in the balance.

Share