US Senate confirms Dan Caine after Donald Trump's military shakeup

Senate approves new Joint Chiefs chairman amid controversy over military loyalty and leadership changes.

Retired Lt. Gen. Dan Caine, nominated to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testifies during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on April 1, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu

By Anna Fadiah and Hayu Andini

In a move that underscores the magnitude of Donald Trump’s military shakeup, the United States Senate confirmed Dan Caine as the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in a 60-25 vote early Friday morning. The decision follows a series of abrupt firings that have shaken the foundations of U.S. military leadership since Trump returned to office in January. Among the most controversial dismissals was that of General Charles “CQ” Brown, the previous Joint Chiefs chairman, whose removal sparked bipartisan concern about the growing politicization of the military under Trump’s administration.

Donald Trump's military shakeup has not only rattled Washington but also alarmed military analysts who view the replacement of top generals as part of a broader attempt to reshape the armed forces to align more closely with the president's political vision. Critics argue that the speed and scope of the changes threaten the long-standing principle of military impartiality — a value that has long been considered sacred in the U.S. defense establishment.

Dan Caine, now promoted to four-star general, addressed those concerns head-on during his Senate confirmation hearing last week. “My allegiance is to the Constitution,” he said. “I have taken an oath not to any individual, but to uphold the values and integrity of this institution and to serve without partisanship.”

Despite such assurances, Trump’s military shakeup continues to raise eyebrows. Since taking office again, Trump — alongside his Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — has executed a systematic purge of top military officials who were appointed under previous administrations. While some of the dismissed generals had clashed with Trump during his prior term in office, others were reportedly removed for what insiders describe as a “lack of alignment” with the president’s current foreign policy objectives, particularly concerning China, NATO, and the Middle East.

The choice of Caine — a career air force officer with extensive experience in strategic command roles — is seen by many as a strategic move. He is respected for his calm demeanor, technical expertise, and background in intelligence and joint operations. Yet even his supporters acknowledge that he takes on this role at a time of exceptional volatility and scrutiny.

At the heart of the controversy is the perception that Donald Trump’s military shakeup is designed not only to install loyalists but also to enforce a more aggressive, centralized chain of command. Trump has repeatedly emphasized the need for a military that is “strong, decisive, and not bogged down by bureaucracy or political correctness.” In practice, this has meant replacing independent-minded leaders with those more in step with the administration’s evolving agenda.

According to several retired officers and Pentagon insiders, morale among senior leadership has taken a hit. “The speed with which these changes are happening is unprecedented,” said one former Defense Department official who requested anonymity. “What we’re witnessing is not just a change in personnel — it’s a shift in philosophy.”

Still, the White House insists the changes are necessary. In a statement following the Senate vote, Press Secretary Sarah Matthews described Caine as “a patriot who embodies the highest traditions of military service.” She added, “President Trump has full confidence that General Caine will lead with honor, strength, and a clear understanding of today’s complex security landscape.”

Democrats, however, remain unconvinced. Senate Minority Leader Alex Padilla issued a scathing rebuke during the floor debate. “This is not just about one general being replaced,” he said. “It’s about the integrity of our armed forces. It’s about whether the commander-in-chief respects the principle of civilian control and nonpartisan leadership within the military.”

Caine, for his part, has emphasized unity and stability moving forward. “This is a time of significant global challenges,” he told lawmakers. “We must be prepared to counter threats from state and non-state actors alike. And we must do so with clarity, resolve, and absolute fidelity to the Constitution and the American people.”

As the U.S. continues to navigate a tense global environment — from a resurgent Russia to the rapidly advancing capabilities of China — the role of the Joint Chiefs has never been more critical. The chairman serves as the principal military adviser to the president, secretary of defense, and the National Security Council. In this capacity, Caine will be expected to help shape defense policy, manage crisis response, and ensure that the armed forces remain prepared for a wide array of threats.

But as long as Donald Trump’s military shakeup remains fresh in the public memory, questions about loyalty, politicization, and institutional stability will linger. Analysts warn that the true test of Caine’s leadership may not lie in battlefield strategy but in his ability to maintain the credibility and independence of the military in a highly polarized political climate.

In closing remarks during his confirmation hearing, Caine acknowledged the magnitude of the moment. “I understand the weight of this responsibility,” he said. “And I intend to carry it with transparency, professionalism, and deep respect for the men and women who serve.”

Only time will tell whether he succeeds — or whether the reshuffling of the nation’s military leadership under Trump will have long-lasting repercussions that extend far beyond the current term.

Share